So, with the recent release of the movie, it appears that the fashionable thing to do at the moment is to snipe about Eat, Pray, Love. It’s faux feminism wrapped in deceptive, inaccessible privilege. It’s more bullshit self-actualization, the Oprah-fication of everything. And, snidely, with a slight hiss, it’s self-indulgent.
Now, listen. Whatever blows your hair back. What you like, you like, and what I like, I like — chacun á son goût. Really. I happened to love the book. I thought it was well written and that Elizabeth’s Gilbert’s voice was intelligent and witty and warm. I didn’t quite love the last third of the book as much as the first two parts, but, you know, it was still a book where I found phrases and words that would make me pause and roll them around on my tongue just for the pleasure of it, like a deep, red wine. Elizabeth Gilbert is a writer. And I will tuck my feet under me and curl up on the couch and pore over a VCR manual if it’s well written, if it has words that are chosen and spun and delicious and golden.
So if you didn’t happen to like it because you didn’t happen to like it, then that’s fine by me. But what’s making me cranky — well there are two things making me cranky. The first is the whole faux feminism, privileged, yadda, yadda business. These things always make me kind of weary. Why can’t successful women be feminists? Does money take away that right? Do you think Elizabeth Gilbert would have been able to walk away from her marriage, decide to travel and write and do what she really wants with her life instead of having babies if she wasn’t a fucking feminist? Is there some gold standard of feminism that I’m not aware of?
As for Ms. Gilbert’s international and emotional journey being one that most women can’t aspire to, well, nope it’s not. (Nor does she really sell it that way. It’s just, simply, her journey.) I certainly wouldn’t be able to decide to take a year off to travel should my life hit the skids. But, then, it wasn’t really a year off, was it? She was able to take the trip because she had a book deal. I don’t know from experience, but I hear writing a book is hard. Really hard. A shit ton of work. So, in other words, it wasn’t a year off. She was travelling, sure, and living life, but she was also working — doing what she does to make a living. “Working” has a slightly different ring to it than swanning around Italy just because you’re spoiled and you can, doesn’t it? Certainly, her version of working for a living is almost immeasurably more interesting than mine or, I’m sure, most women, but I’m not sure why her success in this regard isn’t considered inspiring and instead revokes her status as a feminist. I thought that was the point of feminism — we can do what we want, and we can do it well.
So, listen. Those last few paragraphs were really just because I get all twitchy when women accuse other women of not doing feminism correctly. “You’re not conforming to the tacitly understood scripts of non-conformity! Here’s my academic argument as to why you, as a woman, are not good enough. Let me lash out at you in the name of feminism to defend…other women!” So, you might be surprised to learn that, in fact, the whole point of this here post is not about feminism but is instead to muse about how freaking weird we here in North America are about pleasure. [Here, let me insert a thesis apropos of nothing and in complete betrayal of the entire introduction! This type of thing is, I'm sure, why people like Elizabeth Gilbert are internationally successful authors and why I am a middling editor at Random Non-descript Non-profit.]
So, uh, to back up a bit, this slightly out-of-character post isn’t because I’m just so damn passionate about Eat, Pray, Love. I mean, I liked it and all, and clearly the feminist comments irk the hell out of me, but it’s not some personal mission or anything to get everyone to like this particular book. However, the inevitable comments about the book being “self-indulgent” do hit me a little closer to home. You see, I happened to read the book while we were biking across Canada, which makes it sort of inextricable for me in my mind from our bike trip. It wasn’t just the timing, though, it also has to do with the parallels — we went on our epic, life-changing journey after I had chosen to walk away from my own shitty, soul-eating situation (in my case a truly wretched job) in search of something better, bigger, more alive. Biking across Canada was…awesome. It was fun, it was terribly hard, it was feet dangling off of docks and sunshine and birds startled into flight and the crush of muscles pulling you up a hill and the wind racing next to you on the way down. It was without a question the best thing I’ve ever done with my life, and I grew stronger in every way imaginable. In fact, not a day goes by when my core isn’t nurtured by all the things I learned cycling under the big wide sky. I am kinder, wiser, and more compassionate, with a well of forgiveness that sprung up in me after I had time and silence, peace and thoughtfulness.
And that trip — that incandescent trip — gets lumped in the self-indulgent yuppie pile.
And, yeah, okay, sure it does. We heard it before we left, we heard it during, we heard it after. For all the people who were excited or inspired, there would be one or two who would cut their eyes at us and talk about our adventure with thinly veiled hostility. Before we left, there were vague rumours and speculation floating around, largely to do with how we were financing the time off work. While we were on the road we were asked again and again who we were riding for, what cause were we supporting. One woman, who had approached us in a roadside restaurant in rural Ontario somewhere, actually turned on her heel and walked away from us in disgust when she found out we weren’t riding for charity, that all of our work was just for our own pleasure.
How we financed the trip actually turns out to be relevant to my point, so I’ll tell you how we financed it: we saved. We saved every penny we could for two years. This didn’t stop us from making our usual charitable contributions [ahem, random lady in Ontario], or from contributing to our regular savings plans. So it wasn’t easy. We made do, we went without, we lived small. We made dozens of little sacrifices on a daily basis (which I go into below), not the least of which was me sticking out my job, even though it was completely toxic. That part? The part with all the careful planning and hard work? That part felt pretty much the opposite of self-indulgent.
Now, suppose we didn’t want to take that trip. Suppose it had just never crossed our minds, for whatever reason. Suppose instead of having a goal that we were working towards we were just sort of…going along. And in just sort of going along we didn’t have to make the choice to live in a 500 square-foot, one bedroom apartment and instead we lived somewhere in the suburbs, in a McMansion even. Because we could. And suppose that in living in the suburbs we had to get a car, maybe even two, instead of biking and taking transit like we chose (and choose) to do. And instead of making our meals from scratch and brown bagging our lunches we chose to grab takeout and fast food, ignoring the health and environmental implications — no time to cook on account of the long commute, you see. And instead of training for our bike trip, we parked ourselves in front of the TV, and became part of whichever demographic it is that’s keeping crappy reality television afloat. All of those things are, arguably, pretty self-indulgent aren’t they? They aren’t thoughtful, conscious, compassionate, or generous choices. Yet they’re also, arguably, pretty normal, pretty standard fare here in North America. So normal that, in fact, had we made any or all of those choices, no one would have spat the word “self-indulgent” at us, probably because it wouldn’t have occurred to them to notice us at all.
So it would seem that if you make a conscious choice to be self-indulgent, which is really just another way of saying if you make a conscious choice to take pleasure in your life, then that brand of self-indulgence is unacceptable. But if your self-indulgence happens to fit within the norm and is neither a choice nor especially pleasurable, then that’s okay. No one will sneer at you in parking lots or hiss about your finances behind your back. We seem to be, as a society, uncomfortable with pleasure. We grouse constantly about all the things that everyone shouldn’t be doing, we have fits about all the people who shouldn’t be fucking or enjoying fucking, we fixate on all the things we shouldn’t eat…and we forget about all the things we could be doing, whether it’s enjoying eating or fucking or sitting on the end of a dock with our face turned up to the August sun.
I will say this about my self-indulgent trip: it made me a better person. That time and that peace wouldn’t have been possible if I had been working, keeping up with all the mundane demands of being an adult. And without that time, the compassion and forgiveness that I can offer the world now simply wouldn’t have happened. Or it would have taken years and years for me to find it among all the noise. So, yes, Ms. Gilbert’s travelling for a year in response to a nasty divorce is maybe a little frivolous from the outside looking in, but I can tell you from experience that the work involved in getting to a place where you can take true pleasure in your life is anything but. We’re not obliged to suffer or abstain. It’s okay to enjoy life even when other people can’t. We are blessed, really, to live the silly, frivolous lives that we do. And it’s easy to forget to be grateful for the silly, frivolous life that you have if you’re not taking pleasure in it. There is, in the end, more humility and grace in gratefulness, in truly appreciating how lucky you are to have a job, a couch, a TV, abundant food, choices.








